Transparency only from authors? Insights from 'mysterious' retractions in obstetrics and gynecology

The authors investigate the implications of limited editorial transparency in the retraction process of scientific papers, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology, and how this affects authors, especially early-career researchers. They highlight that while failures in peer review can compromise scientific integrity, inadequate communication from journal editors can lead to significant emotional and professional repercussions for affected authors. The study calls for a more balanced approach to transparency that benefits both data reporters and publishers.