Diagnosis and management guidelines for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome around the world: A scoping review and comparative study of international approaches
Listen to this summary
The authors aimed to compare and synthesize international guidelines for the diagnosis and management of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) to identify trends and regional differences in recommendations. Their analysis of 28 guidelines revealed a consensus on the importance of electroencephalography, but notable disparities in treatment approaches between high-income and low- to middle-income countries, particularly regarding first-line therapies and assessment of treatment response. The study highlights the need for harmonized guidelines to address these disparities and improve care for infants with IESS.
This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.
Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

More in Psychiatry & Neurology
View all →Aug 10, 2026 · Critical care medicine
A 1-Hour Resuscitation Bundle for Prehospital Management of Septic Shock
Aug 10, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Updating the Epidemiology of Pediatric Critical Care in the United States: 2001-2022
Aug 10, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Heterogeneous Treatment Effects of Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study Using a Japanese ICU Registry
Aug 7, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Telemedicine Critical Care Billing For Hospitalized Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2018-2024
Aug 7, 2026 · The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
School-based intervention study examining universal approaches for depressive symptoms and mental health literacy of pupils in Year 9 in England (AWARE): multi-school, parallel group, cluster randomised controlled trial
Aug 7, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Rethinking Muscle Wasting in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Myofiber Size and Protein Turnover
"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."
Dr. Jennifer Thompson
Portland, OR


