Water Vapor Therapy for the Management of Prostate Cancer: The VAPOR 2 Study Initial Results of Ablative Efficacy and Toxicity
Listen to this summary
The VAPOR 2 study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of water vapor therapy for ablating prostate tissue in men with intermediate-risk localized prostate cancer. Initial results from 110 participants indicated that 75% had benign tissue on follow-up biopsy, with a significant reduction in PSA levels and prostate volume, while adverse events were generally mild and resolved without complications. These findings suggest that water vapor therapy may be an effective treatment option with low procedural morbidity for this patient population.
This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.
Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

More in Urology
View all →Jun 25, 2026 · International urogynecology journal
Predictors of Perceived Sports Performance in Female Athletes: The Role of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction and Sleep Quality
Jun 24, 2026 · International urogynecology journal
Postoperative Mobility After Partial Semitendinosus Tendon Harvesting in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery: Results of a Prospective Observational Study
Jun 24, 2026 · International urogynecology journal
Content Validity of Measurement Instruments Used to Assess Patient Quality of Life (QoL) in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review
Jun 24, 2026 · Lancet (London, England)
Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy of the oral ghrelin receptor agonist AC01 in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (GOAL-HF1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a study
Jun 24, 2026 · JAMA
Self-Directed vs Clinician-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Jun 24, 2026 · The New England journal of medicine
Ten-Year Outcomes after CAR T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Lymphomas
"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."
Dr. Jennifer Thompson
Portland, OR


