Coronavirus and Its Implications for Psychiatry: A Rapid Review of the Early Literature
Listen to this summary
The authors aim to synthesize the early literature on the implications of the coronavirus pandemic for psychiatric practice and outcomes. They found that while there is a growing body of evidence regarding the psychological effects of COVID-19, particularly among vulnerable populations, most studies are of weak quality and lack data on diagnostic or functional impairments. The review highlights significant gaps in knowledge and suggests that consultation-liaison psychiatry could enhance understanding of the relationship between the pandemic and psychiatric care.
This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.
Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

More in Psychiatry & Neurology
View all →Aug 7, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Geographic Access to Care and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock: A Nationwide Cohort Analysis
Aug 7, 2026 · The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science
School-based intervention study examining universal approaches for depressive symptoms and mental health literacy of pupils in Year 9 in England (AWARE): multi-school, parallel group, cluster randomised controlled trial
Aug 7, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Telemedicine Critical Care Billing For Hospitalized Medicare Fee-For-Service Beneficiaries, 2018-2024
Aug 7, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Rethinking Muscle Wasting in Critical Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Myofiber Size and Protein Turnover
Aug 6, 2026 · The American journal of sports medicine
Preoperative Proximal Migration of the Radial Head as an Independent Predictor of Suboptimal Outcomes After Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation for Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Aug 6, 2026 · British journal of sports medicine
Training-related concussions in men's English Premiership Rugby Union: an eight-season prospective cohort study of 153 243 player-weeks
"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."
Dr. Jennifer Thompson
Portland, OR


