May 9, 2026 · The American journal of cardiology · DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2026.04.065

Confidence-Accuracy Alignment in Cardiology Knowledge: Comparing Medical-Specific and General-Purpose Large Language Models Using ACCSAP

Listen to this summary

The authors investigate whether medical-specific large language models (LLMs) provide improved clinical reliability compared to general-purpose models in cardiology knowledge assessment. Using a standardized benchmark, they found that general-purpose models like Gemini and ChatGPT outperformed the medical-specific model MedGemma in diagnostic accuracy, although all models exhibited poor confidence calibration. The study concludes that while general-purpose LLMs may excel in complex clinical reasoning, their self-reported confidence is not a reliable indicator of correctness, suggesting a need for clinician oversight in their use.

Ali Zidan, Mousa El-Sururi, Avi Belbase, Yazan Saleh, Rohan Kalasipudi, Reem Al-Rawi, Abdulaziz Malik, Shyla Gupta, Marco V Perez

This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.

Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

14-day free trial. No commitment.

"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."

Dr. Jennifer Thompson

Dr. Jennifer Thompson

Portland, OR

Stay current without falling behind

33,000+ journals. 3-minute audio summaries. Free for 14 days.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play