March 17, 2026 · Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · DOI: 10.1111/acem.70260

Bot-Tastic: Overload Burden of Unsolicited Peer Review Requests, Field of Expertise, and Narrative Hot-Takes

Listen to this summary

The authors aimed to quantify and analyze the burden of unsolicited peer review requests on senior academic physicians, examining factors such as relevance, prior relationships with journals, and emotional responses to these requests. Their study found that a majority of solicitations were from unfamiliar journals and often deemed irrelevant, leading to high rates of declined or ignored requests and feelings of frustration among reviewers. The findings suggest a need for editors to improve the peer review request process to mitigate reviewer fatigue.

Shan W Liu, Timothy Horeczko, Jaime Jordan, Samuel O Clarke, Daniel P Runde, Wendy C Coates

This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.

Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

14-day free trial. No commitment.

"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."

Dr. Jennifer Thompson

Dr. Jennifer Thompson

Portland, OR

Stay current without falling behind

33,000+ journals. 3-minute audio summaries. Free for 14 days.

Download on the App StoreGet it on Google Play