"Soft-Tissue Response to Hard Tissue Changes Following Facial Feminization Surgery: A Three-Dimensional Region-Based Study"
Listen to this summary
The authors aimed to analyze the relationship between bony modifications and soft tissue changes following facial feminization surgery (FFS) to improve aesthetic outcomes. Using pre- and post-operative CT scans and 3D photographs from 70 patients, they found significant correlations between soft tissue and bony changes, with variability in response ratios across different facial regions. The study highlights the importance of understanding these regional differences to enhance surgical planning precision in FFS.
This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.
Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

More from Plastic and reconstructive surgery
View all →May 27, 2026 · Plastic and reconstructive surgery
Impact of Fixation Methods on Long-Term Bone Graft Hypertrophy in Free Fibular Flap Transfer: Analysis of 51 Lower-Limb Reconstructions
May 27, 2026 · Plastic and reconstructive surgery
TMR and RPNI Sustainably Reduce Long-Term Pain and Opioid Use after Oncologic Amputation: A Comparison With Untreated Amputees
More in Plastic Surgery
View all →Sep 23, 2026 · The New England journal of medicine
Clinical Uses of Common Genetic Variants Associated with Common Diseases
Sep 23, 2026 · The New England journal of medicine
Effect of Screening with Multicancer Early-Detection Test on Late-Stage Cancer Diagnosis
Sep 23, 2026 · The New England journal of medicine
Phase 1 Study of Anito-cel, a d-Domain BCMA CAR T Cell for Refractory or Recurrent Myeloma
Sep 23, 2026 · The New England journal of medicine
Etuvetidigene Autotemcel for the Treatment of Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome
Sep 22, 2026 · Aesthetic plastic surgery
Intramuscular Fat Grafting for Pectoralis Volumization in Transmasculine Patients. Combining Chest Masculinization and Chest Contouring in One Surgery
Sep 22, 2026 · Aesthetic plastic surgery
Robot-Assisted Breast Augmentation
"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."
Dr. Jennifer Thompson
Portland, OR


