Higher versus Routine Intraoperative Blood Pressure Targets in Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials
Listen to this summary
The authors aimed to determine whether targeting higher intraoperative blood pressure values during noncardiac surgery improves clinical outcomes compared to routine blood pressure management. Their systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 randomized trials involving over 15,000 patients found no significant benefits in major postoperative outcomes, such as acute kidney injury or mortality, although there was a potential reduction in postoperative delirium that requires further investigation. Overall, the findings suggest that higher blood pressure targets do not confer substantial advantages in this surgical context.
This is one of 33,000+ journals available on OSLR. Try it free for 14 days.
Free 14-day trial. 33,000+ journals. Cancel anytime.

More in Anesthesiology
View all →Jun 24, 2026 · Journal of addiction medicine
Trends in Public Opinion About US Illicit Drug Policy: Results From the 2000 to 2025 Gallup Survey
Jun 24, 2026 · Journal of addiction medicine
Implementation of Dyadic Care to Support Clinical, Administrative, and Service Wraparound Needs for the Opioid-Exposed Mother and Infant
Jun 24, 2026 · Critical care medicine
Ethical Implications of the Slow Code: A Systematic Review of Ethics of Slow Codes in U.S. Hospitals
Jun 24, 2026 · Lancet (London, England)
Safety, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory efficacy of the oral ghrelin receptor agonist AC01 in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (GOAL-HF1): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a study
Jun 24, 2026 · Journal of addiction medicine
Medicaid Prior Authorization and Discontinuation of Buprenorphine
Jun 24, 2026 · The New England journal of medicine
Ten-Year Outcomes after CAR T-Cell Therapy for B-Cell Lymphomas
"Oslr has become part of my weekly routine on my day off. The clinical relevance of the summaries is outstanding — I'd rate it 9/10. Being able to consume research hands-free is a huge advantage for busy physicians."
Dr. Jennifer Thompson
Portland, OR


